<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[celebrity cases - Aretsky Law Group, P.C.]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/tags/celebrity-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/tags/celebrity-cases/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Aretsky Law Group's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 17:01:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Lack of Prenuptial Agreement Complicates Oil Baron’s Divorce]]></title>
                <link>https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/lack-of-prenuptial-agreement/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/lack-of-prenuptial-agreement/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Aretsky Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[celebrity cases]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[equitable distribution]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[prenuptial]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p> Wife Could End Up One of Richest U.S. Women   A man once considered to be one of the most influential people in the world now reportedly stands to…</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Wife Could End Up One of Richest U.S. Women</strong></p>



<p>A man once considered to be one of the most influential people in the world now reportedly stands to lose a good chunk of his fortune during his divorce.</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright"><img decoding="async" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IVN97XyAIl0/Ub779U3FKxI/AAAAAAAAEZo/ogc0QbgcE4M/s320/money.jpg" alt=""/></figure>
</div>


<p>What is reportedly the main culprit? Not the oil baron’s alleged infidelity, but the lack of a prenuptial agreement. Harold Hamm, chief executive at Continental Resources, is in the middle of divorcing his wife of 25 years, according to Reuters. An article on <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100816022" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CNBC</a> says it could end up being the costliest divorce settlement in history and threaten the stability of Continental Resources.</p>



<p><strong>Settlement Could Exceed $3 Billion</strong></p>



<p>Such a divorce settlement could cost Hamm $3 billion or more, which would make his wife one of the 20 wealthiest women in the United States. Forbes estimated earlier this year that Oprah Winfrey’s fortune is estimated at $2.8 billion. Hamm’s fortune is estimated to be at least $11 billion. Sue Ann Hamm, 56, is a former attorney at Continental Resources. She and her estranged husband have two daughters. According to the CNBC article: The couple tried to quietly litigate their divorce by filing anonymously as Jane Doe v. John Doe in an Oklahoma court last year. But many details have emerged since Reuters got wind of the story.</p>



<p><strong>Couple Agree To Two Key Terms</strong></p>



<p>Sue Ann is reportedly alleging that her husband was unfaithful. However, the couple have reportedly agreed to two key terms: a no-fault divorce and to set the date of separation at sometime in May 2012. The separation of assets would then be based on the estimated wealth of the couple on that date, which is key because the value of Continental Resources has nearly quintupled since 2007. Oklahoma law allocates assets based on “equitable distribution,” which means assets are divided based on what’s fair, not equal.</p>



<p><strong>Court to Decide How Much Wife Contributed</strong></p>



<p>It’s unclear how Harold Hamm, who reportedly owns more oil in the ground than anyone else in the United States, would produce the necessary settlement sum. Continental Resources spokespeople declined to comment to the media on the matter, saying the divorce is a private matter. But a costly settlement could affect the future of Continental Resources since Hamm owns 68 percent of the company. If Hamm decides to sell a portion of his share, he may no longer be the majority shareholder and other owners could become more powerful in the company. The divorce case is reportedly entering the “valuation phase,” where the judge must decide how much Hamm’s own hand and his wife’s support together played in the success of Continental, or whether outside forces had a bigger role. Sue Ann would stand to get more if the judge finds that Hamm, with his wife’s support, was instrumental in guiding the company to success.</p>



<p><strong>Rags-to-riches story</strong></p>



<p>Hamm’s rags-to-riches story might work against him. He is the 13th child of an Oklahoma sharecropper who first started out at age 20 scrubbing scum from oil barrels. Just a few years later, he discovered a 75-barrel a day oil gusher and catapulted his earnings into a university education that led him to found Continental in 1967. Continental gradually grew, finding most of its financial success after 2007. Legal experts are estimating that the final settlement could possibly go 60 percent higher than Rupert Murdoch’s last divorce, currently the highest divorce settlement ever. Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/76657755@N04/7408506410/in/photolist-chEwR9-dSK3tm-cnchKE-6hSkjK-aFDjPB-8usD9K-cMnty-aFAQEv-bta55K-bZvUDS-42PQoC-4msAS-brd1K2-aFAPtx-bi1bhM-a2YSa6-dB7F8e-doZD-bta3kH-biaRHp-8HWvej-9kJxyv-d8Zd4W-iH2Hy-8rrQAb-5o2WfU-7iWW5W-5p8w8o-9kMzLQ-a5SwX-9kMAcY-73pgai-eeq5iW-713m5r-9C9vCS-bDwJ11-8i2WXz-aFDcrg-2abVs-d3koK-68vjKV-5oQysH-68zxeQ-68zxij-ykzEf-8rrQG3-9hznDB-8LCMVv-9FPrx5-55FLSR-bu6sBd" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tax Credits </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Singer Justin Bieber investigated for alleged reckless driving]]></title>
                <link>https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/singer-justin-bieber-investigated-for/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.aretsky-law.com/blog/singer-justin-bieber-investigated-for/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Aretsky Law Group]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
                
                
                    <category><![CDATA[careless driving]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[celebrity cases]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[moving violations]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[reckless driving]]></category>
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>   The case illustrates a more widespread problem&nbsp;  Who knows what tune Justin Bieber will be singing when Los Angeles County detectives wrap up…</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-case-illustrates-a-more-widespread-problem">The case illustrates a more widespread problem</h2>



<p>
Who knows what tune Justin Bieber will be singing when Los Angeles County detectives wrap up their investigation on the singer’s alleged reckless driving in his own neighborhood?
</p>


<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright"><img decoding="async" src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-N77zuZWIbCo/UaXRK2BkpAI/AAAAAAAAETo/KTrjXUappp8/s320/JBiber.jpg" alt=""/></figure>
</div>


<p>Two witnesses told deputies that the famous singer allegedly drove his Ferrari at freeway speeds in a residential 25 mph zone on Monday night, according to the sheriff’s department. A key witness was NFL star Keyshawn Johnson who told deputies he was outside with his three-year-old daughter, who was about to get into a toy electric car, when Bieber allegedly sped by. Johnson got into his own car and tried to confront Bieber, but the singer drove home and went inside, refusing to talk, a sheriff’s spokesman told the <a href="http://music.yahoo.com/news/justin-bieber-investigated-reckless-driving-020739558.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Associated Press</a>.</p>



<p><strong>Investigators seeking reckless driving charge</strong></p>



<p>The sheriff’s department said investigators would send their report to prosecutors to consider filing misdemeanor charges of reckless driving. It’s too early to speculate whether there is any truth to the accusations or whether there is enough evidence to charge the young star. However, the alleged incident in the upscale Calabasas community in Los Angeles County is one that could happen in any neighborhood in America.</p>



<p><strong>Reckless driving a problem in many neighborhoods</strong></p>



<p>The issue of reckless drivers speeding in residential zones is a constant complaint, especially in neighborhoods with lots of young children. Countless accidents and fatalities have occurred due to motorists driving too fast or carelessly. In New Jersey, reckless driving carries a penalty of five points that can be added to a motorist’s driver’s license. Other potential charges and the penalty points: careless driving (2 points), exceeding maximum speed limit by 30 miles or more per hour (5 points), exceeding the maximum speed limit by 15-29 miles per hour (4 points), exceeding the speed limit by 1-14 miles per hour (2 points).</p>



<p><strong>Reckless driving charge carries jail time</strong></p>



<p>Both reckless driving and careless driving are misdemeanor charges, but both are punishable by jail time and motorists could have their license suspended. If found guilty of reckless driving, you could be jailed for up to three months and receive a fine of up to $500. If found guilty of careless driving, you could be jailed for up to 15 days and be fined up to $200. A reckless driving charge in New Jersey is when a motorist is accused of operating a motor vehicle in a way that knowingly endangers property or others. Photo credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/65565160@N06/5967601372/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">CarinaLLBieber</a> per</p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>